Photosensitivity in cutaneous lupus erythematosus
Identifieur interne : 001184 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001183; suivant : 001185Photosensitivity in cutaneous lupus erythematosus
Auteurs : Andrew Kim [États-Unis] ; Benjamin F. Chong [États-Unis]Source :
- Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine [ 0905-4383 ] ; 2013-02.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Acad, Acad dermatol, Apoptosis, Arch dermatol, Arthritis rheum, Autoantibody, Case report, Chong, Clin, Cutaneous, Cutaneous lesions, Cutaneous lupus erythematosus, Dermatol, Diagnostic criteria, Endocrine society, Erythematosus, John wiley sons photosensitivity, Kuhn, Lesion, Lupus, Lupus erythematosus, Lupus patients, Mcgrath, Photochem photobiol, Photodermatol, Photodermatol photoimmunol photomed, Photoimmunol, Photomed, Photoprotective, Photoprovocation, Photosensitivity, Phototesting, Phototesting results, Scle, Skin lesions, Sledai scores, Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, Systemic, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Ultraviolet radiation, Visible light.
Abstract
Background: Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a well‐known exacerbating factor for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with photosensitivity comprising one of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, discerning true photosensitivity in this population is difficult due to the broad language utilized by the ACR and the delayed‐onset nature of photosensitive lupus lesions. Aims: The objective of this report is to provide a review of photosensitivity, photoprovocation, and phototherapy in the context of CLE patients. Methods: A literature review in PubMed was conducted using the terms ‘ultraviolet light,’ ‘lupus erythematosus,’ ‘photoprovocation,’ or ‘photosensitivity.’ Results: Self‐patient reporting of photosensitivity and the broad definition of photosensitivity have led to the wide range of photosensitivity rates in CLE patients. Photoprovocation testing provides a more objective method to measure photosensitivity, but even these trials demonstrate significant differences due to protocol variations. Despite UVR's deleterious effect on lupus patients, ultraviolet A (UVA)‐1 may have therapeutic benefits as shown by observations on murine models and human lupus subjects. Conclusions: Accurately discerning photosensitivity has diagnostic implications for SLE and provides motivation for greater patient adherence to photoprotective methods.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12018
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001A10
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001A10
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000236
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 001185
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 001184
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Photosensitivity in cutaneous lupus erythematosus</title><author><name sortKey="Kim, Andrew" sort="Kim, Andrew" uniqKey="Kim A" first="Andrew" last="Kim">Andrew Kim</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chong, Benjamin F" sort="Chong, Benjamin F" uniqKey="Chong B" first="Benjamin F." last="Chong">Benjamin F. Chong</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E43FEF44249606DD614AFC8D1F6478576DFC06C2</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/phpp.12018</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-CN2H4X4H-1/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001A10</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001A10</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001A10</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000236</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000236</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-4383:2013:Kim A:photosensitivity:in:cutaneous</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001185</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001184</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001184</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Photosensitivity in cutaneous lupus erythematosus</title><author><name sortKey="Kim, Andrew" sort="Kim, Andrew" uniqKey="Kim A" first="Andrew" last="Kim">Andrew Kim</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, TX, Dallas</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Dallas</settlement><region type="state">Texas</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chong, Benjamin F" sort="Chong, Benjamin F" uniqKey="Chong B" first="Benjamin F." last="Chong">Benjamin F. Chong</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, TX, Dallas</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Dallas</settlement><region type="state">Texas</region></placeName></affiliation><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine</title><title level="j" type="alt">PHOTODERMATOLOGY, PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY AND PHOTOMEDICINE</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-4383</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0781</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="4">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="11">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-02">2013-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-4383</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-4383</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acad</term><term>Acad dermatol</term><term>Apoptosis</term><term>Arch dermatol</term><term>Arthritis rheum</term><term>Autoantibody</term><term>Case report</term><term>Chong</term><term>Clin</term><term>Cutaneous</term><term>Cutaneous lesions</term><term>Cutaneous lupus erythematosus</term><term>Dermatol</term><term>Diagnostic criteria</term><term>Endocrine society</term><term>Erythematosus</term><term>John wiley sons photosensitivity</term><term>Kuhn</term><term>Lesion</term><term>Lupus</term><term>Lupus erythematosus</term><term>Lupus patients</term><term>Mcgrath</term><term>Photochem photobiol</term><term>Photodermatol</term><term>Photodermatol photoimmunol photomed</term><term>Photoimmunol</term><term>Photomed</term><term>Photoprotective</term><term>Photoprovocation</term><term>Photosensitivity</term><term>Phototesting</term><term>Phototesting results</term><term>Scle</term><term>Skin lesions</term><term>Sledai scores</term><term>Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus</term><term>Systemic</term><term>Systemic lupus erythematosus</term><term>Ultraviolet radiation</term><term>Visible light</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a well‐known exacerbating factor for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with photosensitivity comprising one of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, discerning true photosensitivity in this population is difficult due to the broad language utilized by the ACR and the delayed‐onset nature of photosensitive lupus lesions. Aims: The objective of this report is to provide a review of photosensitivity, photoprovocation, and phototherapy in the context of CLE patients. Methods: A literature review in PubMed was conducted using the terms ‘ultraviolet light,’ ‘lupus erythematosus,’ ‘photoprovocation,’ or ‘photosensitivity.’ Results: Self‐patient reporting of photosensitivity and the broad definition of photosensitivity have led to the wide range of photosensitivity rates in CLE patients. Photoprovocation testing provides a more objective method to measure photosensitivity, but even these trials demonstrate significant differences due to protocol variations. Despite UVR's deleterious effect on lupus patients, ultraviolet A (UVA)‐1 may have therapeutic benefits as shown by observations on murine models and human lupus subjects. Conclusions: Accurately discerning photosensitivity has diagnostic implications for SLE and provides motivation for greater patient adherence to photoprotective methods.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Texas</li></region><settlement><li>Dallas</li></settlement></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Texas"><name sortKey="Kim, Andrew" sort="Kim, Andrew" uniqKey="Kim A" first="Andrew" last="Kim">Andrew Kim</name></region><name sortKey="Chong, Benjamin F" sort="Chong, Benjamin F" uniqKey="Chong B" first="Benjamin F." last="Chong">Benjamin F. Chong</name><name sortKey="Chong, Benjamin F" sort="Chong, Benjamin F" uniqKey="Chong B" first="Benjamin F." last="Chong">Benjamin F. Chong</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/ChloroquineV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001184 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001184 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= ChloroquineV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E43FEF44249606DD614AFC8D1F6478576DFC06C2
|texte= Photosensitivity in cutaneous lupus erythematosus
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |